The legal landscape for web accessibility is changing fast. Here is what you need to know.
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) was signed into law in 1990, long before the modern internet existed. Title III of the ADA prohibits discrimination by “places of public accommodation” — businesses open to the public, including hotels, restaurants, stores, theaters, and banks. The statute lists 12 categories of public accommodations.
The critical legal question since the mid-2000s has been: does a website count as a place of public accommodation? Courts have increasingly answered yes. While the statute does not explicitly mention websites, federal courts across the country have held that the ADA’s protections extend to the digital presence of businesses that also have physical locations — and many courts have gone further, ruling that purely online businesses are also covered.
In April 2024, the U.S. Department of Justice published a final rule under ADA Title II (which covers state and local government entities) establishing specific technical standards for web accessibility. The rule explicitly adopts WCAG 2.1 Level AA as the required standard.
Compliance deadlines:
Large entities (50,000+ population): April 2026
Smaller entities: April 2027
While the DOJ rule technically applies to government entities under Title II, it has massive implications for private businesses under Title III. First, it establishes WCAG 2.1 AA as the government’s clear benchmark for what “accessible” means. Second, courts in Title III cases will almost certainly reference this standard when evaluating private-sector compliance. Third, it signals that the DOJ may pursue a similar rule for private businesses.
ADA website accessibility lawsuits have grown explosively:
| Year | Federal ADA Web Lawsuits |
|---|---|
| 2018 | 2,258 |
| 2019 | 2,256 |
| 2020 | 3,503 |
| 2021 | 4,011 |
| 2022 | 3,255 |
| 2023 | 4,605 |
| 2024 | 8,800+ |
| 2025 | 12,000+ (estimated) |
The majority of these lawsuits are filed by a relatively small number of “serial plaintiffs” and law firms who target businesses with readily identifiable accessibility issues. eCommerce sites are the most frequent targets, followed by food service, entertainment, and travel businesses.
Even if you believe a lawsuit is frivolous, fighting it is expensive:
The total cost of a single ADA web accessibility lawsuit commonly ranges from $15,000 to $100,000+. Proactive remediation typically costs a fraction of this.
If your business falls into any of the ADA’s 12 categories of public accommodation (and most businesses do), your website likely needs to be accessible. This includes:
Even businesses without physical locations have been successfully sued. If your website is open to the public and you operate as a business, you should treat accessibility as a requirement.
When courts rule in ADA web accessibility cases, they typically require:
AccessCheck by NormSuite scans any URL against WCAG 2.1 AA criteria and identifies the issues most commonly cited in ADA lawsuits. Get a compliance score, prioritized issues, and specific fix suggestions in 60 seconds. The free tier includes 3 scans per day.
Check Your ADA Compliance FreeYes. Courts have consistently held that ADA Title III applies to websites of businesses that are places of public accommodation. The DOJ final rule effective April 2026 explicitly requires WCAG 2.1 AA for state and local government websites.
The DOJ published a final rule under ADA Title II requiring state and local government entities to make their websites conform to WCAG 2.1 Level AA. Large entities must comply by April 2026, smaller ones by April 2027.
Most ADA website lawsuits settle for $5,000 to $50,000 plus attorney fees. However, defense costs alone can exceed $10,000 to $100,000. Serial plaintiffs file hundreds of nearly identical lawsuits, making even frivolous claims expensive to fight.
Proactively scan your website for WCAG 2.1 AA issues, fix identified problems, publish an accessibility statement, and document your ongoing efforts. Courts look favorably on businesses that demonstrate good-faith accessibility efforts.